Intel Xeon Platinum 9242 Processor (48C/96T, 2.30Ghz, 71.5MB)
Intel Xeon Platinum 9242 2S V AMD EPYC 7601 - ServeTheHome
Intel Xeon Platinum 9242 review | 55 facts and highlights
The Intel Second Generation Xeon Scalable: Cascade Lake, Now with Up To 56-Cores and Optane!
Vi xử lý máy chủ (Cpu) Platinum 9242|Cpu server platinum 9242, Cpu Server
Intel Announces Cascade Lake up to 56 Cores and Optane Persistent Memory DIMMs | Tom's Hardware
Intel Releases Second Generation Intel Xeon Scalable CPUs - StorageReview.com
Intel Xeon Platinum 9242 review | 55 facts and highlights
List of Intel Xeon processors - Wikipedia
Servidor Silix® 192* Núcleos Escalável-DRH Intel Xeon 9242 Platina 2.3 GHz 143MB / 64GB DDR4 ECC RDIMM / 2x 1TB SATA3 / Rack 2U / Hot-Swap / Dual Xeon - Silix Tecnologia
Cascade Lake-AP: Intel presents 56 Core Processor with 400 watts of TDP | PC Builder's Club
AMD EPYC Rome NAMD and the Intel Xeon Response at Computex 2019
Intel Barebones, S9248WK2HAC 2U RM (2x)Xeon Platinum 9242 (S9248WK2HAC)
Intel Replies to AMD's Demo: Platinum 9242 Based 48 Core 2S Beats AMD's 64 Core 2S : r/intel
OMPG2012 Result: Intel Intel Server System S9248WK1HLC (2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 9242, 2.3Ghz)
Stacking Up Cascade Lake Xeons Against AMD Epyc For HPC
2nd gen Intel Xeon Scalable Processor Cascade Lake CLX 30-3-30
Intel Xeon Platinum 9200 Formerly Cascade Lake-AP Launched - Page 2 of 2
Intel Xeon Platinum 9242 with 48 cores in a benchmark outperforms the AMD EPYC Rome with 64 cores - HardwarEsfera
Xeon Platinum-Xeon Platinum Manufacturers, Suppliers and Exporters on Alibaba.com
Intel Xeon Platinum [email protected]/3.8Ghz(Turbo) 48C/96T @350 Watt | Precomp - Server Store
Hands on with the 56-core Xeon Platinum 9200 CPU: Intel's Biggest CPU Package Ever
Xeon Platinum 9242 - Intel - WikiChip
Intel Xeon Platinum 9242 (2.30 GHz, 71.5 MB L2, 48C/96T, 350 W, FCBGA5903) - TIN HỌC SAIGON
Intel Xeon Platinum 9242 vs Intel Xeon E3-1245 v6 Comparison
Cheshire Merc Cat on Twitter: "@aschilling @intel 46% more power and 50% more bandwidth for less than 2% difference. Not exactly impressed by this one." / Twitter
